The Nevada Gaming Control Board has suggested the removal of a loophole that requires casinos to payout jackpots to banned players. [Image: Shutterstock.com]
An unfair system
A new proposal in Nevada aims to close a loophole that allows people banned from casinos to still claim any jackpot wins they secure while contravening bans.
new regulation that would give casinos the all-clear to not payout
The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) put forward the new regulation that would give casinos the all-clear to not payout if they previously told the gambler to leave and never return.
This would extend to anyone in the infamous “Black Book,” a list of people banned from entering any gambling property in the entire state.
Plenty of support
As per the proposed rule, property would need to return the stake of the winning jackpot spin, and clearly signpost its policy at entrances, in their gaming floor rules, and on their websites. An avenue would also remain open for the gamblers to pursue civil action to receive their payout.
The regulator will get feedback from the casino sector before voting on the matter at a future meeting. A number of operators have already voiced their support for the change though, with some requesting minor changes to the wording of the amendment.
Hendrick emphasized that hearing examiners are “overworked”
The regulator claims it is inundated with player-casino disputes over the matter. NGCB Chairperson Kirk Hendrick emphasized that hearing examiners are “overworked.”
The reason for this measure
The catalyst for this change came after a headline-grabbing incident last year that saw the Casablanca Resort in Mesquite forced to pay out a jackpot worth $2,045 to a player who trespassed at the property on six occasions.
Gamblers in Nevada can currently submit a direct appeal to the NGCB if they have a dispute with a casino and seek a mediation hearing.
The NGCB reviewed the loophole at the time, with the vote ending in a tie, which kept the existing rule in place. Industry stakeholders voiced their unhappiness with the loophole, leading to internal discussions at the NGCB about making a change.
